The Most High's name and his son's name.

Yahawah Ba Ha Sham Yahawashi:

Yahawah = The Most High's Name
Ba = In
Ha = The
Sham = Name
Yahawashi = So called Jesus' real name (Mashiach = Savior)

Monday, December 29, 2008


There is no old and new testament. The whole book is called the gospel (the good news) not just the "new testament." The Deuteronomical books (the first 5 books in the bible/the books of Moses) dealt with the law and Yahawashi said:

Matthew 5:17
Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fullfil.

As I explained before in a previous blog post about what is sin and what is love, love is keeping the law and sin is breaking it. The reason why Yahawashi had to die for our sins is that the greater part save the kingdom of Judah only did not have the law so to fullfil it he had to give them a way to do so. Which is sacrifice himself so no other sacrifice needed to be made again (lambs on the alters) and now he became the straight gate into heaven, by believing in him.

Proving my point earlier that the book is one not old and new. One message, one beginning and one ending; alpha and omega.

Galatians 3:17
And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.

If the law was done away with then the "promise" of salvation from our sins would be of no effect because their would be no sin to save us from because sin is the breaking of the law.

Monday, December 22, 2008

Israel is Black!!!

Revelation 1:14
His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire; And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters.

Yahawashi had woolly hair, which has ever been how the hair of a negro was described. Feet of burned brass means he was a very dark skin man; burned brass is incredibly black.

Isaiah 2922
22Therefore thus saith the LORD, who redeemed Abraham, concerning the house of Jacob, Jacob shall not now be ashamed, neither shall his face now wax pale.

That is plane.

Amos 9:7
Are ye not as children of the Ethiopians unto me, O children of Israel?

It planely says we are like the ethiopians.

Now this is the killer for me.

Lamentations 5:10
Our skin was black like an oven because of the terrible famine.

Now when black people are suffering due to a famine/starving their skin gets darker and darker. A white person becomes paler and paler. so this is another cut tothose people who are claiming to be Israelites. They are not but do lie as the scriptures say.

Lamentations 4:8
8 Their visage is blacker than a coal; they are not known in the streets: their skin cleaveth to their bones; it is withered, it is become like a stick.

Yahawashi the one you ignorantly know as jesus is black, Abraham was black, Isaac was black and so was Jacob and all the prophets.

And to add another little caveat:

Daniel 7:9
I beheld till the thrones were cast down, and the Ancient of days did sit, whose garment [was] white as snow, and the hair of his head like the pure wool: his throne [was like] the fiery flame, [and] his wheels [as] burning fire.

God Himself is a black man!!!


Leviticus 20:9
9 For every one that curseth his father or his mother shall be surely put to death: he hath cursed his father or his mother; his blood shall be upon him.
Exodus 20:12
Honor thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.

Here follows the real understanding of these two verses.

Isaiah 28:13
But the word of the LORD was unto them precept upon precept, precept upon precept; line upon line, line upon line; here a little, and there a little; that they might go, and fall backward, and be broken, and snared, and taken.

What this verse means is that you have to translate the bible using scripture to backup scripture to clarify the meaning of any scripture, eg:

Revelation 1:14-15
His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire; And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters.

Reading this for the first time one might think it means that his eyes were actually flames of fire. But it does not mean that:

Genesis 49:12
His eyes shall be red with wine, and his teeth white with milk.

You see how that works. The flaming eyes only pertain to the fact that he was a "winebibber," so his eyes were red as in bloodshot (red vains) from drinking wine. So the flaming eyes bit was a parabolic description, not literal.
Now to understand Lev. 20:9/Exodus 20:12:

Matthew 12:46-50
46 While he yet talked to the people, behold, his mother and his brethren stood without, desiring to speak with him. 47 Then one said unto him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren stand without, desiring to speak with thee. 48 But he answered and said unto him that told him, Who is my mother? and who are my brethren? 49 And he stretched forth his hand toward his disciples, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren! 50 For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother.

So your mother and father is not your biological parents but your spiritual mother and father, those who do the work of god. Further more to clarify even further so you understand:

Matthew 10:37-39
37 He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. 38 And he that taketh not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me. 39 He that findeth his life shall lose it: and he that loseth his life for my sake shall find it.
John 12:25
He that loveth his life shall lose it; and he that hateth his life in this world shall keep it unto life eternal.
Luke 14:26
If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple.
Mark 10:28-31
28 Then Peter began to say unto him, Lo, we have left all, and have followed thee. 29 And Jesus answered and said, Verily I say unto you, There is no man that hath left house, or brethren, or sisters, or father, or mother, or wife, or children, or lands, for my sake, and the gospel's, 30 But he shall receive an hundredfold now in this time, houses, and brethren, and sisters, and mothers, and children, and lands, with persecutions; and in the world to come eternal life. 31 But many that are first shall be last; and the last first.

Got it? The bible teaches that most people are wicked, so if you are a righteous person most likely that no one else in your house will be. So if you are happy with everyone and they are happy with you, then you must be wicked:

Exodus 23:2
Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil...

In other words...and it's funny my father and I was arguing about this very issue (the demon). He made a statement saying that when he was my age he was the most popular person in I said really, and what does the bible say about that, he exploded and said that no one can tell him what the bible says; he knew what I would say, I used that scripture on him before.

If you are popular and everyone loves you, if your whole family loves, your neighbors, friends and co-workers, you, are, wicked. You have to go along with alot of evil to get along with so many people. Lies, bearing false witness, jealousy, bigotry, greed and even murder; can you say, Obama? Everybody loves him...hint hint hint!!!

If you are righteous this would be the reality of your situation:

Matthew 10:36
And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.

John 15:19
If ye were of the world, the world would love his own: but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you.

1 John 3:1
Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not.

John 14:17
Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.

Eccle. (Apoc) 27:9 The birds will resort unto their like; so will truth return unto them that practise in her.

Friday, December 19, 2008


Some will ask, didn't Yahawashi say "love your enemies?"

Sure, but that does not mean being a fool; you think he meant go kiss your enemy on the cheek?

Ephesians 5 15
See then that ye walk circumspectly, not as fools, but as wise, 16 Redeeming the time, because the days are evil.

Grow up, love is keeping the law. Which means don't break the law to do evil to your enemy. Don't sleep with his wife it is against the law, don't steal from him it is against the law, don't subject him to usery it is against the law etc. Grow up, you are in a faerietail world.

The bible told us what is love and what is sin. Sin is:

1 John 3:4
Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.

So in Leviticus 20:13, being gay is a sin and I will show you now, that it is also hate.

And love:

2 John 1:6
And this is love, that we walk after his commandments. This is the commandment, That, as ye have heard from the beginning, ye should walk in it.

So love is the keeping of the law of Moses and sin therefore is the opposite. Hate is the opposite of love, so if love is keeping the law then hate as well as sin, is breaking the law.

This is what love is according to the bible, it is not what we have understood it to be and that is why we will continually have strife, continually have inequity in the world because we go by our own understanding and not god's understanding which is the only truth.


Proverbs 14:12
There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.

More on hate:

Ecclesiasticus 25:7
There be nine things which I have judged in mine heart to be happy, and the tenth I will utter with my tongue: A man that hath joy of his children; and he that liveth to see the fall of his enemy.

So it's not all about love, love is just obeying the laws of god:

Ecclesiastes 3:8 A time to love, and a time to hate; a time of war, and a time of peace.

There are many scriptures were god talks about things, people and places he hates.

Ecclesiastes 7:7
Surely oppression maketh a wise man mad; and a gift destroyeth the heart.


Romans 7:18-19
18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not. 19 For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.


Proverbs 14:12
There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.

Jesus even said:

Luke 18:18-19
18 And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?19 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God.

So even jesus knew his flesh was weak and of no good. Your strength is in the spirit not in flesh, in god not man; this is what the bible teaches:

Luke 24
34 Saying, The Lord is risen indeed, and hath appeared to Simon. 35 And they told what things were done in the way, and how he was known of them in breaking of bread. 36 And as they thus spake, Jesus himself stood in the midst of them, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you. 37 But they were terrified and affrighted, and supposed that they had seen a spirit. 38 And he said unto them, Why are ye troubled? and why do thoughts arise in your hearts? 39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have. 40 And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet. 41 And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, he said unto them, Have ye here any meat? 42 And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb. 43 And he took it, and did eat before them., so classic:

Matthew 11:19
The Son of man came eating and drinking, and they say, Behold a man gluttonous, and a winebibber, a friend of publicans and sinners. But wisdom is justified of her children.

One of the first things the brother does after being resurrected is ask for food..hahaaa, hmmmmmmmmm.

Is that not a good illustration of the weakness of the flesh, this thing is practical. If you take that appraoch all things will be revealed to you. No faerie tales just keep it real, be truthful to yourself.


Luke 19:21
For I feared thee, because thou art an austere man: thou takest up that thou layedst not down, and reapest that thou didst not sow.

You know what austere means:

1 a: stern and cold in appearance or manner b: somber , grave 2: morally strict : ascetic

He was not friendly in general, he was harsh and very stern. Does that sound like someone that would hug his enemies. More on Yahawashi:

Revelation 1:15
And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters.

He had a very deep voice with an austere/stern cold personality. At 33 his hair was completely white, because he was dealing with a "stiff neck hard headed people," that would not listen. He was stressed and the scriptures clearly shows he drank a lot, but never preached while under the influence because that is also against the law.

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Monday, December 15, 2008

Who are the real jews/Israelites

Those people in Israel are not Jews they are Khazar; more accurately they are the edomites.
The true Jews are the black people who were taken into slavery. The prophesies pertaining to the nation of Israel in Deuteronomy clearly proves that and here is a DOCUMENTARY on the issue.
The bible clearly tells you that we the Israelites will not know who we are so why are those people saying they are Jews. Why are they in Israel when the bible says we will not be there until the lord comes back and gather us up and place us there. It says we will be powerless against our enemies and flee 7 ways before them yet Israel has already beaten the combined force of Egypt, Iraq and Iran. All this hubbub about Iran possibly getting a nuke in the next 10 years and Israel already has 300 warheads. That does not sound helpless to me. The prophecies also say we will be among many different people and in many different religions, that definitely is not these people who call themselves Jews.

Revelation 3:9
Behold, I will make them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold, I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have loved thee.

Who are the Edomites today, they are the descendants of the Romans. These people are the descendants of Esau Jacobs twin brother who was supplanted. What these Edomites are doing are trying to reclaim their heritage in an unrighteous way (against the law, which is hate) by rewriting history: repainting the icons which were originally black - coveting that which is not fit for them. It is a conspiracy, that is clearly in the bible.

Psalms 83:2-12
2 For, lo, thine enemies make a tumult: and they that hate thee have lifted up the head. 3 They have taken crafty counsel against thy people, and consulted against thy hidden ones. 4 They have said, Come, and let us cut them off from [being] a nation;
that the name of Israel may be no more in remembrance. 5 For they have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against thee: 6 The tabernacles of EDOM, and the Ishmaelites; of Moab, and the Hagarenes; 12 Who said, Let us take to ourselves the houses of God in possession.
No longer in remeberance; we do not know who we are today because it was taken away during slavery. Psalms 83:2-12 the whole world took part in the cover up as well, even to this day.

Job 9:24 The earth is given into the hand of the wicked:
he covereth the faces of the judges thereof; if not, where, and who is he?

Who rules the world eh? They covered up our faces...
Isaiah 29:16
Surely your turning of things upside down shall be esteemed as the potter's clay: for shall the work say of him that made it, He made me not? Or shall the thing framed say of him that framed it, He had no understanding?

Black people are not all from Africa, biblically the sons Ham are the Africans. The sons of Shem also were black and so was Noah.
The Africans were not capturing and selling into slavery other Africans, they were selling the refugees of Israel after it was sacked in
70AD. Over a period of about 1500 years we kept migrating from the east coast of Africa to the west coast. Leaving behind as we went stragglers ie. the falashas etc. The greater part settled in west Africa and there our enemies eventually rounded us up and put us into bondage.
Many of us were at the time were living in Europe and thousands of Israelite slaves were taken from europe into slavery. In fact, we are the original kings and queens of those lands. We founded those countries. What do you think the renaissance was about? After our downfall it was meant to revise all things; history and the images/the icons. Which was merely a by product of the original rulers (us, Israelites) being brought down and their enemies now coming into full power.
What you think the crusades was about. Why were Europeans going to Jerusalem with such religious fervor to "save" the holy land yet later persecuted the Jews. If they cared so much, the latter does not make sense. The crusades were so important to the rulers of Europe because they were Israelites/"Jews," and that was their homeland and they wanted to go and defend it; Simple.
This is the truth of the world we are living in. I have been studying for a long time. finding out as an atheist that the original paintings of Jesus were black and simply not caring. Then finding out that the Jews had to be black because the Egyptians were most definitely black; I learned that in history art class - I saw an image of St. Maurice who was said to be an Egyptian. Then I started coming across scriptures like these:

Revelation 1:14-15
His head and his hairs were white like wool, as white as snow; and his eyes were as a flame of fire; And his feet like unto fine brass, as if they burned in a furnace; and his voice as the sound of many waters.

He had woolly hair, which has ever been how the hair of a negro was described. Feet of burned brass means he was a very dark skin man; burned brass is incredibly black.

Amos 9:7
Are ye not as children of the Ethiopians unto me, O children of Israel?

It plainly says we are like the Ethiopians.
Now this is the kicker for me.

Lamentations 5:10
Our skin was black like an oven because of the terrible famine.

Wow. Now, when black people are suffering due to a famine/starving their skin gets darker and darker. A white person becomes paler and paler. So this is another cut to those people who are claiming to be Israelites. They are not but do lie as the scriptures say.
I was, an atheist. So I came into this through my love of research of history and my never ending search for knowledge and understanding (well it has finally, ended). This is the truth and the entire world has been lied to. Esau's name means "wasted away is he," and his name was later changed to Edom. Edom means red, the Rothchilds are his heirs today; their name means red shield or red child.

Genesis 25:25
And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau.

They are behind all the wickedness in the world today, 911, aids, mercury in your vaccines, fake moon landing, causing their culture to take credit for inventions that they and their people had nothing to do with etc. Even their people believe theses lies.
2 Timothy 3:13
But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.

Matthew 10:26
Fear them not therefore: for there is nothing covered, that shall not be revealed; and hid, that shall not be known.

Monday, April 28, 2008

True Strength - A poem I wrote

What is True Strength
Being honest with oneself is an affliction
You’re weak if you show consideration? Driving
To school with aggression; why?
you have to steer me down; won’t look away
“I’m not afraid; Not afraid of what you think.”
Of me? If you look away?
You are macho. Reeeaaally?

Now I’m walking up to you; you’re in the way
Are you going to move; I’ve got to say, “Excuusse me!!!?”
Why? You’re a “Grown ass man,” your not afraid.
You are macho.

Can you stand in a crowd and say out loud
“I am against the war, Iraq is not evil, President Bush is.”
With out fear of what people will say.
Can you blow the whistle at your job if there practices are racist
Without fear of the repercussions; because it’s right.
Stand against the norm? refuse to be assimilated?
Refuse to compromise? How macho are you again?
You…are…a man? Reeeaaally?
This is true strength? No!!!!
You are a coward.

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

You have a right to bear arms!!!

What happened in this disgusting video is a direct result of the peoples right to bear arms being infringed upon.

What people seem to not understand anymore - when in the past it was but common knowledge (I wonder why - the purposeful dumbing down of the American sheeple is another post, for another day) - is that the main purpose for the second amendment was to protect the people against tyrannical governments, i.e. the video above.

Texas has the lowest crime rate in the country why? Because their the second amendment is protected and respected (though the supreme court is in the process of changing that). Not only people have a right to bear arms most people have a conceal and carry. Switzerland has the 4th lowest crime rate in the world because like Texas you can own guns, the only difference is there, you can have explosives as well. Matter of fact it is legally required for you to have C4 and automatic weapons in your home. Most people respect and obey the law, if it is illegal to carry a gun then only criminals will have them and the average person becomes victims. People are not the enemy, criminals are. Guns don't kill people, people do.

Nor are they harmful to children:

[W]hereas, to preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of the people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young...
---Richard Henry Lee, The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788.(here)

Guns are really our very freedom!!!

"Firearms stand next in importance to the constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence … from the hour the Pilgrims landed to the present day, events, occurences and tendencies prove that to ensure peace security and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable … the very atmosphere of firearms anywhere restrains evil interference — they deserve a place of honor with all that's good."
George Washington
First President of the United States (here)

You need guns to protect yourself from the wickedness of tyranny; believe me when I tell you, those "police officers" knew that man was not armed.

Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretence, raised in the United States. A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power (guns), and jealousy will instantly inspire the inclination, to resist the execution of a law which appears to them unjust and oppressive.
---Noah Webster, An Examination of the Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution (Philadelphia 1787).(here)

Malcom had it right; If you are not willing to fight for it you don't deserve it. Guess what would have happened if those spineless cowards came upto his door making threats like that.

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

The truth about gold and silver

Do you know the reason why gold and silver was always precious. It's not just because they are scares, it was because they had medicinal value as well. Google colloidol gold and silver.

Why you think the nobles of europe ate off silver plates and used silver utensils; silver destroys bacteria. How do you think they preserved food back then, when they were not using spices which was discovered long after they were using silver? They sealed their meat in silver containers. Even in the 1930's silver was used to preserve milk, by placing a silver coin in a glass of milk you could preserve it in open air for about 3 days. Doctors don't tell you that fucking shit.

Gold is for the brain. Even recently(1940s) they used it by putting it under the skin to treat cronic pain in the joints and migrain headaches; all that knowledge is gone from public view.

Gold is also the only edible metal; that alone should tell you something (by the way, do not eat silver, if it doesn't kill you your skin will turn ashen grey...permanently).

Monday, February 25, 2008

This is the truth!!!!!!

Just how much of our culture is subverted in this way. We have been made to feel so insecure and Thus, have become so depraved that, we are almost willing to do anything for a big contract deal. If this is the only way to make it, I guess I won't.

Almost all rappers are gay; gangsters my ass!!! Wake up and stop emulating these devils.

Leviticus 20:13
"If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them."

There is a part 2 to this video.

Sunday, February 17, 2008

More on the Economy

"Even including Iraq/Afghanistan supplementals and other defense/intel spending scattered around the government, the total cost of all military spending is currently around 4% of GDP, compared to 14% during the Korean War, 9% during Vietnam and almost 40% during WWII." A comment made by a friend of mine. 

I realize many of you would probably hold this same view and I thought I should share what I thought of this here:

"Budget Deficit" vs. "National Debt"

Suppose you want to spend more money this month than your income. This situation is called a "budget deficit". So you borrow. The amount you borrowed (and now owe) is called your debt. You have to pay interest on your debt. If next month you don't have enough money to cover your spending (another deficit), you must borrow some more, and you'll still have to pay the interest on the loan. If you have a deficit every month, you keep borrowing and your debt grows. Soon the interest payment on your loan is bigger than any other item in your budget. Eventually, all you can do is pay the interest payment, and you don't have any money left over for anything else. This situation is known as bankruptcy.

Each year since 1969, Congress has spent more money than its income. The Treasury Department has to borrow money to meet Congress's appropriations. The total borrowed is more than $8,000,000,000,000 and growing. Even when government officials claim to have a surplus, they still spend more than they get in. We pay interest on that huge debt.

The full aticle is here, the topic head being The National Debt is $9.2 Trillion!

Here is more on the truth about budgets and deficits (shocking!!!). Here is more also.

Here is another article, and below is a quote from it:

The $2.77 trillion budget plan emphasizes spending on the country’s fight against terrorism, while deeply cutting domestic programs. 141 domestic programs will be reduced.

The Agriculture Department is hit with the third-largest percentage decrease in spending of any department. Reductions would come from cuts to rural development, forest service, conservation and research programs.
If you think it's so cheap, suggesting it is not hurting the US economy and bankrupting the country, then why is it that our businesses are now accepting euros in manhattan; this is unheard of.

You speak as if the economic issue is all about the war, it is not. This has been going on for sometime now and the war is just the final straw, the economy will collapse. I have news for you though, it won't just be U.S. that will go down, it is going to be a global collapse.

And this Mcain talking about staying Iraq for a hundred years is not conservative and going into Iran would be the end of our country.

Thursday, February 14, 2008

Money and The Economic System

This is based on an argument I had with some Mcain and Romney supporters on a forum where they just could not get my statement that, "the Iraq war was bankrupting America." The counter was that, if world war 2 did not bankrupt the country how could Iraq. Well....

The only reason why america was not bankrupt by world war 2 was:

"According to my parents, who lived through the depression, it was already pretty much over by the time the war started. But I haven't researched this myself. I know that our armed forces were upgrading their equipment during the 30's, and that, along with other government programs, helped to end the depression. Nearer to the start of the war, we supplied England (and later on, the USSR) with military aid, which helped our economy." (WikiAnswers)

The proof:

Gold standard from peak to crisis (1901–1932)

Abandoning the standard to fund the war

The British government ended the convertibility of Bank of England notes to gold in 1914 to fund military operations during World War I. By the end of the war Britain was on a series of fiat currency regulations, which monetized Postal Money Orders and Treasury Notes. The government later called these notes banknotes, which are different from US Treasury notes. The United States government took similar measures. After the war Germany, having lost much of its gold in reparations, could no longer coin gold "Reichsmarks" and moved to paper currency, although the Weimar Republic later introduced the "rentenmark" and later the gold-backed reichsmark in an effort to control hyperinflation.

In the
UK the pound was returned to the gold standard in 1925, by a somewhat reluctant Winston Churchill. Although a higher gold price and significant inflation had followed the WWI ending of the gold standard, Churchill returned to the standard at the pre-war gold price. For five years prior to 1925 the gold price was managed downward to the pre-war level, causing deflation throughout those countries using the Pound Sterling. This deflation reached across the remnants of the British Empire everywhere the Pound Sterling was still used as the primary unit of account. The British government abandoned the standard again on September 20, 1931. Sweden abandoned the gold standard in October 1931, the U.S. in 1933, and other nations were, to one degree or another, forced off the gold standard.

Depression and World War II

British hesitate to return to gold standard

During the 1939–1942 period, the UK depleted much of its gold stock in purchases of munitions and weaponry on a "cash and carry" basis from the U.S. and other nations.[citation needed] This depletion of the UK's reserve convinced Winston Churchill of the impracticality of returning to a pre-war style gold standard. John Maynard Keynes, who had argued against such a gold standard, became increasingly influential. He proposed a more wide ranging version of the "stability pact" style gold standard, later expressed in the Bretton Woods Agreement. (wikipedia)


America didn't go bankrupt because it was a major exporter of weapons and other goods during world war 2. Also most countries relatively speaking, recently got of the gold standard and the dollar was stronger then than it is today. An ounce of gold in 1939 was $35, today it is $920. Mater of fact over the last 5 years the value of gold has gone from $350 an ounce to $920. That's a runaway rise, an exponential rise; meaning runaway inflation. Do you know where gold is projected to be in the next 2 years, $3500 an ounce, get that through your heads (lol, Mcain said he would stay in Iraq for a 100 years...stay in the middle east for a 100 years, ha!!!).

Listen up, you Mcainites and Romneyites, your getting an education today:

Fifty Years Since Korea:
Fifty Years of Presidential Wars

Has a president the constitutional authority
to initiate a conflict?

By Paul W. Lovinger

A half-century late, atrocities from the Korean war have made the news: first, massacres of civilians by U.S. troops; next, killings of political prisoners without trial by South Korean soldiers and police. Fifty years have passed since President Truman began what he termed a "police action" to stop "aggression" on June 27, 1950. It became a major, three-year war, in which North Korea and Communist China were fought to a stalemate. And it was the first U.S. war in which a president asserted a right to start it.

Truman took his action without asking Congress for a declaration of war, contrary to what his predecessor, Franklin D. Roosevelt, had done on December 8, 1941. Truman said a United Nations resolution gave him authority. But he had ordered armed forces to Korea before the U. N. acted. Moreover, the U.S. never made any agreement with the U.N. to provide armed forces. And anyway, how could Congress delegate away its lawful authority?

Korea was the first in a score of foreign wars entered by presidents without authorization by Congress. The total of unauthorized military or paramilitary operations reaches several score more. The Korean war and later presidents' wars, including Vietnam, took millions of lives, about 113,000 of them American. Congress's failure to reverse Truman's decision established a routine in which (1) the president assumes dictatorial control over war and peace and (2) Congress submits to the seizure of its exclusive, constitutional power to declare war.

President Clinton has ordered wars or acts of war in eight countries, including Somalia, Haiti, Bosnia, Afghanistan, and Sudan. In 1999, he was fighting Yugoslavia and Iraq simultaneously. He began bombing the Iraqis in 1993 and continues to strike them, and he is intervening in Colombia's civil conflict. He may have nearly started another Korean war, in June 1994: Kim Young-Sam, then South Korea's president, told a Korean newspaper that he had talked Clinton out of plans to bomb the north, Insight magazine reported (6-26-00). Sometimes Clinton has sought support from foreign leaders or international bodies, never obtaining prior approval by the one body that could constitutionally authorize such acts: Congress.

Yet nearly all political candidates are silent on a matter that tears at the heart of our constitutional system: presidential war. Although such autocracy contradicts democracy, few Democrats in politics object. Nor do many Republican politicos protest that our republic's president has assumed the age-old power of monarchs.

Neither Governor George W. Bush nor Vice President Albert Gore has addressed the issue of the war power specifically. However, each has indicated in campaign debates that as president he would send armed forces wherever and whenever he alone decided it was in the interests of the United States to do so.

Founders vs. presidents

"The Congress shall have power ... To declare war," says the U.S. Constitution (Article I, Section 8). To declare war means to initiate war. That was established usage in 1787, when the Constitution was drawn up. The president is "commander in chief of the army and navy" (Article II, Section 2).

Alexander Hamilton contrasted the president's military role under the Constitution -- "nothing more than ... first General and Admiral"--with the British king's power to declare war (The Federalist, 69). "Commander in chief" was not created with the Constitution but was already a century and a half old. It was always strictly a military rank, without the power to decide war and peace. Such power has been claimed for the president by modern revisionists, beginning in 1950 with the State Department, which sought to justify Truman's Korean action.

The founding fathers made abundantly clear that a president could not lawfully commit any hostile act--except to repel sudden invasion--without prior, formal approval by both houses of Congress. "... Congress alone is constitutionally invested with the power of changing our condition from peace to war," President Thomas Jefferson said (to Congress, 1805).

James Madison explained: History demonstrates that the executive is the governmental branch most prone to war. The Constitution "has accordingly with studied care vested the question of war to the Legislature" (letter to Jefferson, c. 1798).

Notorious transgressions included Polk's provocation of war with Mexico, McKinley's Philippine war, and many invasions of Latin America. But not until Truman in 1950 did any official argue that a president had the inherent right to initiate war.

Few condemned Truman's seizure of congressional authority or considered impeachment. Commentators praised his "courage." Some 54,000 American deaths were counted in Korea.

President Kennedy contemplated atom-bombing Russia over Cuban missiles. Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon produced more than a decade of undeclared conflicts in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia, dooming 58,000 Americans. Usually Congress gave the presidents whatever they asked, including a resolution supporting "peace" in southeast Asia after Johnson had sent bombers to war. Courts timidly ducked every lawsuit to enforce the Constitution.

Presidents engaging in unauthorized hostilities after Vietnam included Ford, in Cambodia's islands; Reagan, in El Salvador, Grenada, Lebanon, Libya, Nicaragua, and the Persian Gulf; and Bush in Panama.

Such actions would not necessarily be legal if authorized by Congress. Treaties binding on the U.S. ban aggression, require peaceful settlement of international disputes, and prohibit attacks on civilians. But allowing one man absolute power over war and peace, life and death -- in place of discussion and decision by 435 representatives and 100 senators -- makes war far more likely. Congress has declared only five general wars and authorized limited war relatively few times.

The framers designed our Constitution to make unnecessary wars unlikely, though their efforts now appear inadequate. As James Wilson, a framer of the Constitution, told the Pennsylvania ratifying convention in 1787, "This system will not hurry us into war; it is calculated to guard against it. It will not be in the power of a single man, or a single body of men, to involve us in such distress, for the important power of declaring war is vested in the legislature at large. . . ."

Here is a Documentary you need to see, without which you cannot fully understand the situation.

Prior to now they have been printing money none stop to finance all these wars, that's what you get when you don't have a gold standard - they could not print more gold, so they made the dollar and they just keep printing out of nothing. So the american dollar is not as strong as it was in 1939. Back then the dollar was 30 times stronger than it is now: Wow!!!

And if you don't think that inflation has not shown on the economy already think again. In new york the subway train used to be 15 cents, now it's $2 and they are talking about making it more right now. I remember when gas was a $1.19, now it's $3.99. Do you get it, america has gone as far as it can go on this monitary system of printing money and creating debt which is the most debt of any country in the world; did you not know this? Why, because we no longer export as much since almost all of our manufacturing has gone over seas and what used to be exports to us, we now manage it financially in taxes and tariffs as imports.

In ww2 we were exporting; the arms, the munitions etc. We were still building, expanding, climbing the mountain. Now we have been at the top, and there is no were else to go but down and we have been going down for sometime now, and on this side of the great mountain, it's steeper and goes farther below see level than the side on which we made our ascent.